A questions was asked on a community page on facebook recently in our small town that got a lot of people talking online. I eventually ventured in, but soon found that my point got lost as the thread lengthened and the content got heated. So rather than continue there, I decided to put my thoughts here.
The issue in the facebook post had to do with a for-profit café leasing and enclosing a portion of the outdoor area out front of the Picton branch of the public library, reducing the commonly held library space by about half.
Before I begin, let me say that I think public libraries are one of the most important resources any community can hold in common, and we have an exceptional one. I believe in the power of libraries for positive change to the extent that I devoted 10 years of my working life to the library here in the County, and I continue to use and support it.
As the discussion grew on the facebook thread, though, I found myself wondering how many of the people commenting were actually library users. Those who use the library as a hang out space, to use the free wifi outside and inside, or to get printing done, are just as much legitimate library users, by the way, as those who check out books. Those who rarely set foot in the library or never use its outside space, might ask themselves how they are supporting the library. In my mind, this all figures into the weight of opinions.
If people are just happy about the new patio because they can now enjoy a cool new spot to eat and drink, then perhaps consideration should be given to the implications for other folks who aren’t able to do so. And yes, people can still sit on the other side of the stairs out front of the library – I get that – but it’s not the same thing as being able to afford to sit and be served food and drink, and everyone knows it.

Also, I will repeat here what I said in my original facebook post; The Vic Café, which is the establishment that was approached by the library, has only done what any other business would have done if offered such an opportunity.
All this aside, the original point of my objection has to do with two things: public input and transparency regarding commonly held resources in our community, and the loss of public space, held in common, to the private sector.
When major changes such as the one in question are planned, ones that involve bringing in commercial interests into the public library, then formal community input should be sought. And whether through public meetings and/or surveys, it should invite those who are library users to have a say, especially those impacted by the change. This did not happen.
As well, the library has multiple platforms for communication such as their weekly library column in the local papers, monthly newsletter, facebook, twitter, etc. The deal cut between the library and the café should have, at the very least, been communicated in an open and timely fashion through these channels so that people could have voiced their support or opposition before the shovels hit the ground. Why did that not happen?
If such an opportunity for dialogue had taken place, creative ideas and options would have undoubtedly come forth. For example, not enclosing the space with a fence (my understanding is this has been done because a liquor license is being sought and that is a requirement for serving alcohol outdoors) for one business’s benefit, and instead creating an open patio where people could get coffee from anywhere in town and enjoy it at tables there. They might have created a children’s play area with a sandbox (which was a brilliant idea the library implemented outside last year), or outlining a little stage area for local musicians and outdoor performances. I’m sure people could come up with many other, and better, ideas. Certainly if this opportunity to engage the community had been given, much of the hard feelings and division that came through on facebook would have been lessened, if not eliminated.
To my second point, common spaces such as library property that are free from the intrusion of the almighty dollar, are important to building thoughtful and caring communities that welcome everyone, including those who may not have money or who may already experience social exclusion.
Many voices on the facebook thread, I think it’s worth noting, did welcome the café on library space. Most of them were people that come from a place of privilege. Some were people I know personally. Social status – and I don’t only mean from money though that often goes hand-in-hand – holds a lot of power. One way it manifests itself is to dismiss other people’s concerns because they don’t affect the privileged personally. And power reveals itself in myriad other ways, including people being confident enough to express themselves in writing in open forums. In that respect, I acknowledge my own privilege.
But back to the issue itself, and possible ways at this time that the situation might be addressed justly. One action would be an assurance from the library’s board that measures will be put in place so any major changes similar to this one regarding public library space will involve community input in the future. Additionally, that once those changes are about to happen, even after public consultation, there will be advance notice in media of what’s coming.
Secondly, that people can sit in this café space, under the tree that’s the only shade available right now out front, without having to spend money. I’ve been told this may be allowed to happen. I’m curious to see how that will be put into practice…signs saying “Public seating, all welcome”?
Thirdly, that some type of shade is made possible on the non-café side, maybe by erecting a sun shelter of some sort.
Lastly, though the County is certainly a beautiful place to live with a lot of great things going for it, can we start to publicly acknowledge and do something about the economic and social divide that’s growing in our community? This is something many people don’t want to see, and definitely not on Main Street. Lack of affordable housing, food insecurity, limited well paying, year round jobs, are all things we should be addressing. Some may ask, “What does that have to do with this issue? Well, a lot actually if we start to look at the bigger picture.
I’ve now disengaged from the facebook thread, but if anyone wants to talk about how we might organize ourselves for a better community for all of us, the importance of the commons, equality, power, or any such fun topics, I’m up for that. Maybe we’ll run into each other at the library, or can meet up at the community gardens or at a Food Not Bombs free community meal in the park.